Paralegal Chat


Forum
 Link Exchange Partners Minimize
 Print   

 Invite Friends Minimize
  

 News Minimize
  


Reply To Message:
Posted By n/a on 8/25/2008 7:14:52 PM
Subject: RE: Free Speech
Message: I agree that Fertik's suggestion is a bad one. But CDA 230 needs to have carefully carved out exceptions. It should not serve as absolute immunity for web administrators who knowingly allow members to post defamatory content on their site without allowing for any sort of recourse for those defamed. But I AM intrigued by this Microsoft suggestion. Please elaborate.
UserName: 
Subject:  Free Speech
Body:
Submit
Cancel
  
Show Replies:
Preview


ActiveForums 3.7

 Latest Posts Minimize

RE: NALA, PACE and NALS
[General Interest]

Governance
[Business Law ]

NALA, PACE and NALS
[General Interest]

Paralegal schools
[General Interest]

Possible career change
[General Interest]

RE: HAPPY NEW YEAR
[Non-Legal Discussion]

RE: HAPPY NEW YEAR
[Non-Legal Discussion]

HAPPY NEW YEAR
[Non-Legal Discussion]

RE: Discouraging!
[General Interest]

Discouraging!
[General Interest]

RE: Have a Holly Jolly Christmas
[General Interest]

Have a Holly Jolly Christmas
[General Interest]

RE: E-Discovery Costs
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]

RE: E-Discovery Costs
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]

RE: Hello and Introduce Yourself
[General Interest]
  

 Members Minimize
Membership Membership:
Latest New User Latest: Kristin
New Today New Today: 0
New Yesterday New Yesterday: 1
User Count Overall: 163

  

 Online Minimize
Visitor [1] : Forum